how do you consider someone at risk? this means you have to give someone the power to label you "at-risk." fuck that. While I'm a moody person in general, i'm nothing like bi-polar personalities which are abound in society. If you started labeling people "at-risk" you'd firstly breaking their constitutional rights by prejudicing them immediately, but secondly, that would make me more likely to take arms in the first place. For me personallly I would take it as a pure interferance in my rights, but worse a person who truly is legitemately sick, is already feeling like the world has labeled him unfairly. That person is thus far more prone to this act.
End of the day, you can't protect everyone, everyday of their lives. They have to use their intuition to call for help if they notice something. Stupid shit happens everyday, that doesn't mean we go around over-reacting to it. It would be a bigger tragedy if we did. Now if you can think of logical solution that doesn't interfere with peoples rights, I'm all for it.
__________________
Quality of Posts > Quantity of Posts
There is a reason I bleed red. United until I die.
Jessica wants to you to come to Terrace Talk: The Official Blog of United Zone

|