![]() |
||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
Social Groups | |||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Status: Roonatic #1
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Liebesträume No. 3
Posts: 1,828
National Team: Bulgaria
vCash: 112
Thanks: 483
Thanked 96 Times in 59 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Now I know I'm probably a little biased in my assessment of the situation, but reading this
http://soccernet-akamai.espn.go.com/...197380&cc=5739 I have come to the absolute conclusion the soccernet is shite. Now I watched this game from Sofia and I'm surrounded by Bulgarians, but that report there, is the biggest piece of rubbish I've read in a while. The Bulgarians dominated, and I seriously mean dominated. They created so many chances that it would have made your head spin. The populace is still trying to figure out how we didn't score, but regardless, to say that it was a one sided affair, i'd have to agree, to say it in the context that it was one sided in Holland's favor is just rubbish. It is so unthinkable that I have to question who is watching which matches. I've followed the website for a few years, but I think currrently they have grown so quick that they are having some quality control issues. Myabe it's just me. I've always liked their editorials, but their match reports just lack a lot of bite, personally.
__________________
Quality of Posts > Quantity of Posts
There is a reason I bleed red. United until I die. ![]() Jessica wants to you to come to Terrace Talk: The Official Blog of United Zone ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|